All year: the monetary policy of the ecb before the court
Not only the background noise of the brexits a piece absorbed far the attention for the judgment of the european court of justice (ecj) on the admissibility of the bonds program of the ecb buying. after all, luxembourg ruled over one of the still rare templates from karlsruhe. this may also have contributed, since the opinion of advocate general wathelet is no longer that of the ecj, the european central bank (ecb) would make a proverbial spanner in the works. nevertheless, the judgment for a number of reasons is remarkable.
Germany v italy: zero to null
The court irons out of the italian objection to the admissibility of the submission of the question out of hand. this corresponds first of all to the established case-law. you could read it, but also that of the ecj, the italian attempt to position itself as a currency and constitution, the political antipode of germany, issued a rejection. the italian government suspected behind the template, the attempt to collect the basic law as a yardstick for the legality of policy measures.
Whether or not the charge is authorized, you may be in doubt. because, after all, the federal constitutional court (bverfg) suggested in his review, both in the justification as well as in the tone of a new chapter. it resisted the attempt, the luxembourg interpretation of the european treaties and addressed instead in a concentrated and detailed with the luxembourg case-law, one might follow him in his remarks or not.
The ecj responds to this offer of dialogue, and not to the (other) scene of the german-italian discussions of the economic and monetary union, or to the water carrier of the italian position. this is almost a necessity, to maintain the court, its authority as the guardian of european law, and it’s a wise strategy to turn to the right from the mediterranean to the antidote of intra-european polarizations.
By their deeds ye shall not recognize you
The court of justice rejects the central argument of the constitutional court, according to which the monetary policy objective and justification of the purchase programme of the ecb would be thwarted by the opinion of all involved significant fiscal impact, this program counter. the aim of a programme and, therefore, his qualifications as a monetary or a fiscal policy measure is measured, therefore, by definition, was given to him by the ecb. this is useful, because already with the pringle decision in luxembourg, the belief that fiscal policy, monetary policy and, more generally, all economic policy measures can have an impact on all areas of economic and financial policies (). the interdependencies are so complex that they do not allow for qualification of the measure.
In addition to the economics of a strong juris, but table argument: the ecb must not be distracted from the goal of price stability because their actions could possibly present economic and political impact of the larger weight, which of these measures would deprive its currency of a political nature (para. 66 of the judgment). put differently: by the plaintiff to the ecb want to create a corset, threaten you, just those in primary law lashed the primacy of price stability, the protect your lawsuit claims. ship sunk.
The way and the truth
This means that the discretion of the ecb are set virtually no limits? my impression is that the judgement is allowed at any point to this conclusion. because of the ecj shows a way, which would be a credit to any administrative court, to the glory of how discretionary decisions check. namely, in accordance with article 296, para. 2 of the tfeu, required justification, which the ecj has dedicated this time to the beginning of a section, as well as the procedure. the ecb’s actions must be consistent. and the ecj is not afraid to go into detail. so he makes the multiple change in the total volume of the purchase programme to go through, because it was in harmony with the development of the inflation rate and regularly checked (at para. 39 and 88). since the disputed purchase program, in contrast to the omt programme has no asymmetric structure, do not need to take recourse to the court other than in the gauweiler-a decision on the stability of the eurozone, the legality of the acquisition program to determine.
More practical concordance cart
A conflict through the decision: in the examination of price stability, the ecj stresses that the fixed volume limits, and the announcement to make the purchases according to the capital quotas of the member states, the monetary policy objective of conducive. because it is only when market participants can rely on the purchase programme, the monetary policy transmission in gear, so there is reason to hope that the markets confidence in the growth prospects of the eurozone and, accordingly, the lending to grow. exactly this reasoning is, however, in connection with article 123 of the tfeu, the prohibition of state financing through the printing press, harmful. therefore, the ecj struggles with the examination of article 123 of the tfeu clearly to establish that the debt management of the states weigh in not in the security and blind to the buying program could leave. what applies to the market participant, not from the perspective of the member states, but completely different. how much more sensible it would not have been, however, to examine the issues of price stability on the one hand, and the monetary state financing, on the other hand, separately, but a connection between the two, such as in the way of practical concordance. this consequence would need to pull the ecj actually from the pringle judgment. the interactions between monetary and fiscal policy cannot ignore the doctrine. after all, in rn. 152 a note of the ecj that goes in this direction; that would be all the more heard more clearly.
Law against politics: on a one-to-zero
The brexit-roar has drowned out all about this decision. because the ecj has managed to take the policy in the sense of “politics” from the matter, to depoliticize without undue within the meaning of “policy”. he demonstrates in an almost exemplary manner the rationalizing effect of legal discourse. you force by no means to refrain from a confrontation with the political implications of a case. but you take him the political agitation. judicial dialogue in the best sense. instead of polarisation busy routine prevails. you may be curious as to whether a possible template in the procedures on the banking union encounters in the same horn (here and here). it is the beginning of a beautiful tradition: all the years would be happy to return.
You read this long post all the way down. thanks, much obliged! now, let me ask you something: do you enjoy reading constitution blog? if you do, please support us so that we can keep up our work and stay independent.
All the best, max steinbeis
Dublin, schengen, and the plug
Germany, it seems, is a vacuum cleaner. undaunted, he sucks in crowds of people from the levant, about the so-called balkan route through the ravaged hungary and the brave of austria in. greedy search always new “work slaves”, driven by the mysterious forces of the german “big business” operates, it is almost the depopulation of the world. zighundert thousands want to devastate germany in the realization of his great plan to clamping, by means of its foreign trade surplus in the world, once and for all. germany no longer ruled as a resistive but as a friendly grinning hegemon, willing to europe (and the world?) his dictation of human kindness to throw. so it’s no wonder that the european partners are groaning under the yoke of an overbearing grin monster! yes, there’s more: the germans, of whom was rumoured to have once they’d solve the case of a revolution, as well as a train ticket, stomp on the common european “rules”, by luring all the loaded of the world in their “hippie state”, regardless of the resulting collateral damage on the way through the territories of other union states, of course. the international reception of the german refugee crisis of politics – as probably the most of any german crisis management policy – ambivalent, to say the least, if you enjoyed part of the time with greatly reduced seriousness degree is delivered. the internal perspective is hardly more encouraging. of the bavarian free state feels not only federal abandoned, but literally overwhelmed by the consequences of ecstatic welcome gestures of a uncontrollably waving chancellor. this wants to see the world in the asylum with friends, but it will soon be no more, at least not in this country. the mood seems to be tilting. the reinhard müller refers, in the light of recent refugee policy decisions by the federal government on the lisbon case-law of the constitutional court, which prohibits the resolution of the heads of state and asks kess, whether the german constitutional bodies were entitled to raise the state order “off the hinges”. and in the local blog (here, here, here, and here) rages on a “cosmopolitanism/kosmopolitik”debate.
Displays a sober observation: the criticism of germany is essentially false. even if it might not like some of the european countries; in contrast to them, germany holds the union’s legal requirements in terms of the dublin procedure and the schengen acquis. anyone who thinks that people who take tremendous hardships, and even ready their lives to risk, need to wait and see the wink of the chancellor, to make a life-changing decision, underestimated the migration dynamics tremendously.
Conflicting decisions on the last balkan stage
Go to the federal government’s short-hand presented ‘stopper solution’ in the form of temporary border controls on the basis of the schengen borders code (article 23 in conjunction with article 25 of regulation no 562/2006) throws, however, as well as the activation of the dublin self-admission to the right the right questions in terms of their impact on the rest of the union. because now two things are in danger of the (already begun; here, here, and here), the domino-like re-introduction of border controls in other countries, as well as – possibly – an accumulation of the just (supposedly) created in the transit countries (also in hungary, where it to 14. september to zero at there managed). man, the pronouncements of the bmi, remains unclear, however, whether it is in fact a u-turn, i.e., whether syrian refugees now fear a return transfer to hungary (or, more recently, to croatia). in any case, the german border (like the hungarian) remains “open”, so that asylum-seekers is, at least, provide for the implementation of the competence examination procedure, or admission to. apparently, the measure v. a. was on the registry, the further handling of it and holds it open, the self-admission is not withdrawn formally. they probably want to wait for the european development. the council of the minister of the interior, in the matter of the establishment of the art. 78, para. 3 tfeu temporary emergency distribution mechanism (120,000 refugees, concerning; “proposal for a council decision on provisional relocation measures for italy and greece go postponed abide”), however, once and only a decision in principle concerning the in may proposed distribution of 40,000 refugees from greece and italy, like it.